File
EIA figures incorrect say lake's supporters
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
Origin Information |
|
---|
Description / Synopsis |
Description / Synopsis
A 6 C A L G A R Y H E R A L D , July 3 1 , 1 9 9 2 Let Editor: Bill Muss EIA figures incorrect say lake's supporters Re " Tory plans to raise Buffalo Lake face opposition," Vicki Barnett, Herald, July 5. The projected benefits of $ 13.6 million from the Buffalo Lake stabilization project outweigh the costs, $ 13.1 million, and more than 90 per cent of the benefit accrues. to the Province. The benefit essentially results from incremental economic activity occurring i n the community, which is paid for by the cottage arM lot owners, and which may not occur i f the water is not stabilized. Additionally, there are spinoff benefits which are not included i n the above numbers, such as employing unemployed laborers for construction, and increased tax revenues, which would further enhance the benefit. In various articles, including the above, The Herald reported the benefit/ cost ratio of the project, basing its figures on the original Environmental Impact Assessment report. However, at hearings held over a year ago our economist identified an error in the benefit calculation which was acknowledged by the author of the benefit/ cost report. These new numbers are accepted as correct by a l l except those who are not aware that the calculation had been corrected. This project was under consideration long before Don Getty bought his property, which is not lake front, some three years ago. The majority of the cottage owners do not even vote in the Stettler riding yet his presence has attracted media coverage and political criticism. We who live on the lake are concerned about its environment. We recognize that both negative and positive impacts would occur, but after studying the E IA are satisfied that the negatives are either minor or mitigatable. Further, many of the negative impacts identified would be more severe without stabilization, in flood years. It is important to recognize that the stabilization proposal does not seek to create a new lake nor raise the water beyond historical levels. Rather, the stabilization project seeks to enhance the recreational and economic benefit of Buffalo Lake by eliminating nature's extremes. C. J. C. PAGE, Pelican Point Community Association, Calgary. |
---|
Publication Title |
Publication Title
|
---|
Physical Form |
Physical Form
|
---|
Local Identifier |
Local Identifier
MKN00011
|
---|---|
Handle |
Handle
Handle placeholder
|
Use and Reproduction |
Use and Reproduction
For Research and Private Study Use Only
|
---|
Subject Topic |
Subject Topic
|
---|
au_6647.pdf264.18 KB
Cite this
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
EIA figures incorrect say lake's supporters
|
Authored on |
|
MIME type |
application/pdf
|
File size |
270524
|
Media Use |